Route comparison
Field notes describe surface, shade, wind exposure and access points for each trail, so two routes can be set side by side on the things that actually decide a day: loose stone, tree cover, an open ridge, a gap in a wall.
Written for people who already know the ground
The trail index is built by hikers, trail runners and cyclists who walk, run and ride these routes themselves. That shapes what each entry tells you and what it leaves out.
-
Surface, described honestly
Packed earth, loose limestone, polished rock, compacted gravel. Notes say how the ground actually feels underfoot, including where it turns slick after rain.
-
Shade and wind, mapped
Continuous pine cover on one climb, none at all on the ridge. Exposure is flagged where it matters, so you can plan around midday sun or a headwind.
-
Access points, not guesses
Where a route starts, where it links to the next one, and where the entry is clear but unmarked. Useful when you are comparing two options for the same afternoon.
-
Several seasons, same ground
Image sequences are shot on foot across different visits, so the same path appears dry, wet, in low winter light or under full summer sun.
-
Plain captions, no sales copy
Captions name the surface, the light and the place. Nothing is dressed up, because the people reading already know what a limestone path looks like.
-
Built for planning and print
Entries work as route comparison for a trip, and as a starting point for licensing or print requests. The contact form handles both, plus new photo sets.
Start with the shaded climb on the Pine Track Above Pupnatska Luka, or see how the same ground is documented across route comparison and licensing.